Melo: If Palmeiras maintains this performance, he will score at least 5 goals against Miami International.

June 16th, in the first round of the Group A of the Club World Cup, Palmeiras drew 0-0 with Porto. Despite failing to win, Melo, a celebrity who serves as a commentator in the game, praised Palmeiras' performance.

In another game in the same group, Messi played for Miami International tied with Cairo Nationals 0-0. What do you think of Palmeiras' next game? Palmeiras will also face Cairo Nationals and Miami International in Orlando yesterday and watched the Miami International v Cairo Nationals game. There is no doubt that if Palmeiras continues to play like they are today, they can score at least five goals against Miami International next time.

Although I failed to score, in this game, Palmeiras' possession rate reached 55%, with 17 shots in the game, 5 of which were directed. These data were higher than Porto

. I would not be surprised by this. I predicted in advance that Palmeiras would play well in this game. And not only Palmeiras, all Brazilian teams participating in the Club World Cup will perform well.

Brazilian football is reproving its strength?

I think this is a good opportunity for Brazilian football to show the world, to prove to Europeans that Brazilian football is not dead. No, Brazilian football is very good and still scares the opponent. We are undoubtedly growing.

But Palmeiras failed to score in this game. What aspects do they lack?

I think they are really missing goals in order to win the game because they have created a lot of opportunities. But Palmeiras' offense is focused on the same side, which makes Porto easier to defend. Maybe the team could consider passing the ball to the other side.

What are the shortcomings of Palmeiras?

Another negative aspect that brought my attention was that Palmeiras lost some aerial confrontation during the game, which they would not lose in South America. Porto was able to create a threat in setting pieces, something Palmeiras' past opponents usually couldn't do.