Big controversy! Curry s alternative remarks have attracted bombardment, criticized for being greedy, and may offend the bosses of 30 teams

Warriors star Stephen Curry has always been a high-quality idol.

Curry is not only good at playing basketball, but also cute, so he also gets the nickname of "primary school student". Curry's character and football quality are beyond words. Whether for fans or teammates, Curry is a high-quality idol and high-quality teammate.

Just ended last season, Curry beat Rockets center Adams and won the "Best Teammate Award" voted by the player anonymously.

It can be said that what surrounds Curry is often positive values and correct orientation.

However, Curry's reputation has also "turned over". In recent days, Curry's words when participating in the show have pushed himself to the forefront of public opinion, and at the same time has also attracted a lot of doubts.

In recent days, Curry has participated in the "360 with Speedy" program and talked about the players' income.

Host: "Alexander just signed a sky-high contract with an annual salary of more than $70 million. Considering the value you bring to the league and the team, do you think your salary is low?"

Curry: "I think because of the current structure of the labor-management agreement, we cannot participate in equity distribution. We are at a disadvantage in terms of income, right? No matter which period you compare to now, the league may have increased by about 10 times. So, part of the reason why I say that our salary is low is that we cannot participate in equity during the game. Distribution. After all, you definitely hope to get a share of this growth."

"I know we are lucky to make a living by playing basketball, and the income is quite considerable. I think these are worthy because basketball is a special 'commodity'. I sincerely hope that the relevant regulations can be adjusted as soon as possible so that players can benefit more from the appreciation of team equity, league valuation, etc. I think we deserve these."

As for Curry's words, once reported, it caused an uproar and was heated discussion. Let’s see what the mainstream view among fans says:

- Will players take the initiative to reduce their salary and subsidize their boss when the boss loses? Do players take such a big risk? When I see others making money, I think it is my credit.

—Although I fancied you, you are a little bit indifferent to human hearts and swallowing an elephant. This is the same view after asking you to be your boss in the future!

—Fortunately, Curry said that if it were James, he would be sprayed to death! !

——The person who only thinks unilaterally is a primary school student, and he will not say such one-sided words when he is truly mature.

—Working workers have to determine the boss’s wealth, and the salary is almost 100 million, and I still say it’s too small! The words of

fans are also reasonable. Indeed, Xiao Hua expanded the NBA's business territory to an unprecedented scale, which also doubled the income of NBA players.

Think about more than ten years ago, the maximum salary of Kobe, Duncan, Yao Ming and others was only 20 to 30 million US dollars. And the maximum salary of today's superstars has reached 70 to 80 million US dollars a year, and they will soon exceed 100 million US dollars an annual salary.

In this case, if you are still dissatisfied with this and feel that you have made less, are you really a little greedy?

Curry's words not only caused controversy among fans, but may also make the bosses of the 30 teams in the league feel uncomfortable. The bosses probably think: You kid earns so much and want to share our shares. Is this going to rebel?

This sounds like a joke, but it is actually not very funny. Who knows if other players have the same idea as Curry?

It seems that it is quite difficult for the bosses. No wonder the Mavericks boss is reluctant to give Doncic a super maximum salary! The money is earned by the players, so the boss is naturally unhappy.

Fan friends, what do you think?